Chronic ocean noise and cetacean population models

Main Article Content

Rob Williams
Danielle Cholewiak
Christopher W. Clark
Christine Erbe
Craig George
Robert Lacy
Russell Leaper
Sue Moore
Leslie New
Chris Parsons
Howard Rosenbaum
Teri Rowles
Mark Simmonds
Raphaela Stimmelmayr
Robert S. Suydam
Andrew Wright


Recent years have seen rapid development of tools and approaches to model population consequences of disturbance in several marine mammal populations from high-amplitude, acute sound sources. Ocean noise from shipping and other maritime activities is now recognized as a chronic, habitat-level stressor. In order to understand population consequences of chronic ocean noise to whales and their populations, advances are needed in several key areas, which are explored in this review. One tractable way to predict population-level consequences of noise-mediated disruption of feeding, which can include both behavioural responses and foraging opportunities lost due to acoustic masking. Masking may be defined as both the process and the amount by which the threshold of hearing of one sound is raised by the presence of another. Parameterising any such model requires information on sensitivity and vulnerability of large whales to ocean noise, in which sensitivity is the degree to which marine features respond to a stressor (e.g., behavioural responses to noise or proportional reduction in foraging efficiency due to masking), and vulnerability is the probability that whales are exposed noise to which they are sensitive. Efforts are underway to provide much-needed information on hearing sensitivity in baleen whales, the role of acoustic cues in foraging, and deriving links between long-term variability in prey availability and whale demography. As this information becomes available, we expect rapid advancement on modelling population consequences of acoustic masking in baleen whales, because those efforts can leverage substantial investments in statistical methodological approaches to model population consequences of disturbance. Pathways of effects other than via foraging disruption (e.g., stress hormones affecting reproduction or disease) are possible, but we illustrate potential ways to proceed based on this tractable approach, namely noise-mediated impacts on foraging. This report highlights case studies of local, national, international, and inter-governmental efforts to monitor and reduce the contribution of global shipping to ocean ambient noise. The following outlines approaches that can be used to assess the risk to baleen whale recovery of existing levels of ocean noise, and consequently, predict the benefits likely to arise from reducing chronic ocean noise.

Article Details

How to Cite
Williams R, Cholewiak D, Clark CW, Erbe C, George C, Lacy R, Leaper R, Moore S, New L, Parsons C, Rosenbaum H, Rowles T, Simmonds M, Stimmelmayr R, Suydam RS, Wright A. Chronic ocean noise and cetacean population models. JCRM [Internet]. 2020Nov.10 [cited 2020Nov.24];21(1):85-94. Available from: